Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics Announces Six Grants to Advance Policy and Best Practices
WASHINGTON (October 26, 2011)—The Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics announced the results of a competitive grants program, “Shaping policy and practice in intercollegiate athletics for the benefit of students and institutions.” The Commission received 38 applications from researchers and organizations throughout the country and selected six for funding. Details on the selected projects are below.
Who’s Minding the Store?
John Casteen, Association of Governing Boards of Colleges and Universities
AGB’s study will identify gaps between actual practices and best practices of athletics program oversight as articulated in AGB’s “Statement on Board Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics.” Such information is critical for chief executives and boards as they develop and implement the best policies for their institutions. In addition, it will enhance the ability of AGB and other organizations to advocate for appropriate board engagement in the oversight of intercollegiate athletics for the benefit of institutions, athletes, and higher education as a whole.
Following a Problematic, Yet Predictable, Path: The Unsustainable Nature of the Intercollegiate Athletics System
John Cheslock, Pennsylvania State University
This research project presents a theoretical model of the intercollegiate athletics system that emphasizes important processes driving expenditure growth that are often not recognized during policy deliberations. The model will enhance the general case for reform within athletics as well as for reform components such as the revenue distribution changes proposed in Restoring the Balance. It will also identify promising new directions for future reform efforts.
What’s At Our Core? NCAA Division I Voting Patterns vs. Student-Athlete Well-Being and the Amateurism Principle
Josephine R. Potuto, University of Nebraska; Connie Dillon, University of Oklahoma; David Clough, University of Colorado
This study will explore whether Division I (and its Football Bowl Subdivision, Football Championship Subdivision, and non-football Division I Subdivision) votes its principles. Voting within the FBS between conferences that are automatic qualifiers (AQs) in the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) and those that are not (non-AQs) will be reviewed. Driving the proposal is the belief that not enough currently is done for student-athlete well-being and that this failure affects the ability to defend amateurism through NCAA bylaws and in the perception of the public.
De-escalation of Commitment in Intercollegiate Athletics: An Investigation of Spending in Division I Universities
Adrien Bouchet, University of Tulsa, and Michael Hutchinson, Coastal Carolina University
The purpose of this study will be to examine de-escalation of spending in university athletic departments. There are two important reasons for studying this phenomenon. First, it will be meaningful to compile data on what university and athletic department personnel assert regarding the subject of de-escalating the “arms race” in intercollegiate athletics. Perhaps more important will be gaining insight into university stakeholders views on how to contain spending in the “arms race”. Second, identifying de-escalation strategies will be beneficial for institutions seeking to break the cycle of escalation regarding athletic spending.
Examining administrator and coach perceptions of value systems in NCAA Division I athletic departments
Coyte G. Cooper and Erianne A. Weight, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The current research will involve an online survey designed to gain an understanding of the core values that are emphasized when carrying out the mission of Division I athletic departments. Using an existing instrument with established reliability that was developed by the investigators, the study will survey the administrators and coaches at each of the NCAA Division I institutions to understand the organizational and aspirational values being emphasized within these departments.
Intercollegiate Athletics Leadership Database
Jennifer Hoffman, University of Washington
The purpose of this project is to continue development of an online database that allows the retrieval of longitudinal information about the people, intercollegiate athletics operations, and campus characteristics at a single institution or group of institutions in one location. The Intercollegiate Athletics Leadership Database is a searchable data source for individual and institutional information on Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) member institutions since 1991. This system addresses the need to inform how personnel decisions in the leadership of athletics shape the context for decision-making over the other operations in intercollegiate athletics.
May 27, 2011
Throughout its history, the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics has pursued an agenda of ensuring that athletics departments are aligned with the educational missions of their colleges and universities. Despite having no authority over intercollegiate athletics or the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the Commission has been successful in advocating specific policies and structures:
- Presidential leadership: Reorganization of NCAA governance to give college presidents decision-making authority over national policies
- Certification: Development of the NCAA certification process to ensure best practices are followed in the management of athletics departments
- Academic integrity: Academic progress reporting and penalties for failing to meet academic benchmarks
- Financial integrity: Improvement in institutional control of athletics-related funds and increased financial transparency
The Commission’s third major report, Restoring the Balance: Dollars, Values and the Future of College Sports, was released in June 2010 to provide a blueprint for using educational values and priorities to improve the management and finances of college sports. To date, the recommendations in the report have garnered major endorsements from U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, the Board of Directors of the Association of Governing Boards of Colleges and Universities, editorial boards, and select leaders in higher education.
To preserve and enhance this legacy, the Commission believes much more work is essential. The Commission desires to broaden its approach to engage scholars and experts in producing research or other projects relevant to the recommendations and concerns addressed in the Knight Commission’s reports. The project outcomes should help academic and athletic leaders, national organizations, athletic conferences, and other constituents make progress toward the goals outlined in these reports, to wit:
- Academic integrity and valuable educational experiences for student-athletes
- Institutional and organizational (e.g., NCAA, conferences) accountability for academic integrity and responsible management
- Treating athletes as students first, not as professional athletes
- Strengthening the principles of amateurism to prevent the commercial exploitation of athletes
- Rewarding practices that make academic values a priorit
- Fiscal integrity of athletics programs
- Greater transparency of finances, including better measures to compare athletics and academic spending
- De-escalation of the “arms race” in spending on athletics
- Promoting the financial sustainability of college athletics and an appropriate balance between athletics and academic spending
- Presidential and academic authority over the operations of intercollegiate athletics
The Commission will award grants for the 2011-12 academic year (including the summer of 2012) for researchers to conduct studies in these areas. The Commission will host a public meeting for researchers to present their work to the media as well as leaders in academe and intercollegiate athletics. This will enable the Commission to use the brand equity and media interest it has built over the past 20 years to bring significant visibility to grantees’ work.
Proposals will be judged on their originality, feasibility, clarity and, most significantly, their relevance to policy and practice in the areas of concern outlined in the Commission’s reports. The final work will belong to the researchers to publish in appropriate venues, but reports to the Commission and the public presentations should be targeted for broad audience of stakeholders in intercollegiate athletics.
To be effective, proposals will need to demonstrate a high level of understanding of the history, structure, politics, and economics of college athletics. The format for proposals may include original scholarship suitable for peer review, policy papers to spur discussion among leaders, or an in-depth journalistic study in print, online, or digital media. Any of these formats will be assessed on an equivalent basis for quality, sophistication, and potential to achieve the identified goals.
Principal investigators may be affiliated with educational or nonprofit institutions, but proposals from publications and other private organizations will be considered. Multi-organizational and interdisciplinary proposals are encouraged.
Levels of grants
Two tiers of grants will be considered. One tier will be considered for funding up to $25,000, based on the quality of the proposal and the justifications in the proposed budgets. The second tier will receive awards up to $5,000 based on the same criteria.
Eligibility and Restrictions
Principle investigators may be affiliated with educational or nonprofit institutions, but proposals from publications and other private organizations will be considered. Multi-organizational and interdisciplinary proposals are encouraged.
PI and project team members will be responsible for coordinating reviews of their work with Institutional Review Boards on their own campuses.
The proposal narrative should be detailed but concise (no more than 2,000 words) and should include the following elements:
Statement of the problem
The statement of the problem should identify the central issue under investigation, hypotheses relating to policy solutions, and other conditions to be considered. This section should explain the importance and timeliness of the problem given current conditions in intercollegiate athletics.
Literature can span across disciplines. Contributions from policy literature and journalism should not be ignored.
A discussion and potentially a diagrammatic description of the theory underlying the project.
Data and methodology
Projects can be qualitative or quantitative in nature, and can involve instructional components, studies to be published in journalistic or policy venues, or multimedia presentations. The Commission can assist with quantitative data. For quantitative projects, this section should include a description of any dataset and criteria for selecting data, descriptive information, rationales for variables included, and analytic techniques. Qualitative proposals should include specifics on the methodology to be employed and how findings can be verified. All proposals should include specific discussions.
Connections between findings and athletic policy
The proposal should be oriented to identifying and supporting specific policy reforms at the institutional, athletic conference, and/or national level within the Commission’s overall set of principles. Proposals should explicitly identify those policies and mechanisms to effect the practical changes identified in the statement of the problem.
Curriculum vitae of the principal investigator(s).
Grants may be used for salary support, travel, data collection, research assistant support, equipment, and miscellaneous expenses such as software and books. Indirect costs and living expenses will not be supported. Separate funding will be provided for grant recipients to attend a summit event to present their findings in 2012.
Funding will be linked to the grant schedule. Two-thirds of the total award will be disbursed at the beginning of the grant period, one-sixth upon the acceptance of the interim report, and one-sixth upon the acceptance of the final report.
Please send a single document in a common format (Microsoft Word, Apple Pages, Google Doc) containing the proposal with all of the above information to email@example.com. Those submitting proposals will receive an e-mail within one week confirming the receipt of their proposal.
May 27, 2011 – Announcement of grant program
August 5, 2011 – Deadline for proposals
October 24, 2011 – Announcement of winners
February 1, 2012 – Interim report due
August 1, 2012 – Final report due
October 2012 – Summit to present grant findings
A committee of Commission members and independent reviewers will evaluate proposals once they have been vetted for completion. Successful and unsuccessful PIs will be notified when the committee has made its decision.
Restrictions, Acknowledgment of Support and Disclaimer
Grant recipients may not disseminate or publish findings from grant research prior to the summit in October 2012, but subsequent publications and presentations are encouraged. Such should include the following acknowledgment and support:
“Research for this project was conducted with the support of the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Knight Commission or the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.”
The October 2012 summit may include a recording of the research presentations. In conjunction with the summit, the Commission may publish the final report for each presentation on its website. In exchange with the final payment, grant recipients give right to the Commission to disseminate each researcher’s final report and a recording of the summit presentation.
Grant recipients retain legal rights to intellectual property developed during grant funding. The development and dissemination of future deliverables beyond the October 2012 summit are highly desired, and grant recipients are expected to make results available to the policy and research community concerned with American intercollegiate athletics.
Please direct any questions to firstname.lastname@example.org.